← All comparisons

fuush vs Vercel

Vercel is the home of Next.js and a powerhouse for full-stack React apps. fuush is for plain static sites — and unlike Vercel’s free tier, you can run a commercial one on us without paying.

The one-sentence difference

Vercel’s free Hobby plan is for non-commercial use; fuush is free for any use. If you’re shipping a landing page for a product, a client microsite, or anything that makes money, Vercel expects you on a paid plan. fuush doesn’t draw that line.

Side by side

Vercel (Hobby/free)fuush
Commercial use on free tierNot permitted (Hobby is non-commercial)Permitted
How you deployConnect git; build runs on every pushUpload a zip, use the CLI, or sync a GitHub repo
Build stepAlways builds (great for Next; overhead for plain HTML)None
Framework pullStrongly Next.js-optimisedFramework-agnostic — it’s just files
AccountEmail or OAuth; team modelEmail magic link
Custom domain + HTTPSYesYes, automatic
Serverless / edge functionsYes (a core feature)No — static only
Lock-inBest value realised inside the Vercel/Next ecosystemA folder you can download and host anywhere

Vercel’s plan terms change; confirm the current Hobby licence on their site. The commercial-use distinction has held for a long time and is the one that catches people out.

Where fuush wins

When Vercel is the better choice

Building a Next.js app, anything needing server-side rendering, edge/serverless functions, preview deployments, or first-class React tooling? Use Vercel — it’s best-in-class for that, and fuush doesn’t try to be. fuush is the right tool when the thing you’re deploying is genuinely static.

Host a static site free →